Career Comms

Practical frameworks strategies to help you communicate more clearly and confidently at work.

    Why Your Brilliant Ideas Die In Meetings

    business communication communication frameworks executive presence impromptu speaking leadership communication strategic communication
    Why Your Brilliant Ideas Die In Meetings

    Read Time: 4 Minutes

    I just listened to a Stanford GSB podcast where Professor Jesper Sorensen said something that stopped me in my tracks:

    “No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.”

    He was talking about strategy, and how leaders often think it’s something you set once a year and then execute.

    But the reality? Strategy has to adapt constantly.

    And that means you need to be able to articulate your strategic thinking on the spot, in real conversations, when you don’t have your slides.

    The problem is most leaders can’t. They freeze. They ramble. They lose the thread of their own argument when asked to explain their reasoning without preparation.

    I see this all the time in The ISA, and I saw it just last week with one of my students.

     

    When Brilliant Strategy Meets Poor Communication

    Vicky, one of my ISA students, is a regional leader at a French fashion company in Hong Kong. She was preparing for her monthly business review with the group CEO, and she’d done her homework. She’d analyzed the data, identified trends, built a compelling strategic case:

    Sales had been declining 35% below budget since April due to tariffs. But August showed the first turnaround, only 10% below budget. European brands and sportswear were performing strongly. Her strategic recommendation: Keep spending on marketing to capitalize on momentum.

    Her strategy was sound. Her argument was logical.

    Then the CFO asked: “Given the sales decline, why shouldn’t we implement immediate cost-saving measures?”

    Vicky knew the answer. She’d spent weeks building the case for why cutting costs now would kill their momentum.

    But in the moment, she struggled. She started explaining August data, then jumped to European brand performance, then mentioned sportswear, then circled back to budget.

    The executives looked confused. They couldn’t follow her logic.

    She had all the pieces: the assumptions, the logic, the conclusion. She just couldn’t articulate the argument clearly when it mattered most.

    This is exactly the gap that strategic communication needs to fill. You can have the world’s best strategy, but if you can’t organize your thinking when leading a meeting, kicking off a presentation, or answering tough questions in an interview, your strategy stays stuck in your head.

     

    The Framework: SAR (Strategic Argument Response)

    Here’s the framework I taught Vicky to organize strategic thinking in real time:

    S: State Your Strategic Logic

    Lead with your conclusion in one clear sentence.

    Example (Vicky’s situation): “Based on the August data, I believe we should maintain our current spending levels rather than implement cost-cutting measures.”

    A: Articulate Your Assumptions

    Make your reasoning transparent and testable.

    Example: “This assumes three things: First, that August’s turnaround, moving from 35% below budget to 10% below, indicates a genuine trend reversal. Second, that our European brands and sportswear will continue their strong performance. Third, that cutting marketing spend now would disrupt the momentum we’re finally seeing.”

    By stating assumptions explicitly, you enable constructive debate. Your team can say, “I disagree with assumption #2” rather than just “I don’t think that will work.”

    R: Respond to the “So What”

    Connect to business impact: profits, market position, or risk.

    Example: “If we cut costs now, we risk losing this turnaround right when customer demand is returning. Historically, when we’ve pulled back during early recovery signals, we’ve extended our slump by 2-3 quarters. But if we maintain our planned activities in high-performing segments, we’re positioned to return to budget by Q4.”

    Notice the structure? Clear conclusion. Transparent assumptions. Business impact.

    That’s how you articulate strategic thinking under pressure.

     

    The Practice Challenge

    Right now, imagine your CEO asks: “Why should we invest in your proposal over the three other options on the table?”

    Set a 90-second timer. Can you answer using SAR?

    S: What’s your strategic conclusion? A: What key assumptions are you making? R: What’s the business impact?

    If you can’t answer clearly in 90 seconds, you don’t have a strategy problem. You have a communication framework problem.

     

    Want to Master This?

    Inside The Impromptu Speakers Academy, we practice key frameworks in my 20-day self-paced program. You’ll get the reps, the frameworks, and the confidence to articulate your strategic thinking clearly when it matters most. More than 100 students like Jaime have immediately seen a difference within the 20 days.

     
     

    No more freezing when asked tough questions. No more rambling through updates. Just clear, confident communication that commands the room.

    Preston

    Become A Brilliant

    Communicator

     

    If you liked this post, join thousands of Career Comms readers getting for more tips, frameworks, and resource like this every Saturday.